Erlang improvement?

Kostis Sagonas <>
Wed Sep 19 19:25:13 CEST 2001


I wrote:

 > There is no ambiguity; to perhaps obfuscate things even more, the
 > above notation is just "syntactic sugar" for 
 > 
 > t2(M,F) ->
 >  apply(fun02,f,[bar,42]).

which indeed is very obfuscated since I meant:

t2(M,F) ->
  apply(M,F,[bar,42]).

Kostis.




More information about the erlang-questions mailing list