snmp traps and snmp_mgr

Chandrashekhar Mullaparthi <>
Mon Mar 5 09:12:26 CET 2001


Yes - it does.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ciaran Johnston [mailto:]
> Sent: 2 March 2001 14:41
> To: Chandrashekhar Mullaparthi
> Cc: 'Erlang mailing list'; Kenneth Browne (EEI)
> Subject: Re: snmp traps and snmp_mgr
> 
> 
> Does this hold for gets and sets also?
> 
> Ciaran.
> 
> Chandrashekhar Mullaparthi wrote:
> > 
> > This is because snmp_mgr will only receive traps from one 
> agent only. This
> > is the agent you would have specified in snmp_mgr:start  - 
> It can be easily
> > extended to receive traps from multiple agents. I did it 
> once and threw it
> > away cos no one in EEI was interested ;)
> > 
> > The crash you see is in the function snmp_mgr_misc:packet_loop/7
> > 
> > cheers,
> > Chandru
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Adrian John Cahill [mailto:]
> > > Sent: 1 March 2001 16:11
> > > To: 
> > > Subject: snmp traps and snmp_mgr
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi ,
> > >     I am trying to receive snmp traps using an erlang 
> application. I
> > > have tried using the snmp_mgr:expect( id, any) function, 
> this returns
> > > ok, for most of my requests, but when a trap is fired, the
> > > following is
> > > displayed in my 'erl interpreter'
> > >
> > > ** exited: {snmp_packet_got_other,{udp,
> > >                                       #Port<0.37>,
> > >                                       {143,239,159,221},
> > >                                       1070,
> > >                                       [48,
> > >                                        65,
> > >                                        2,
> > >                                        1,
> > >                                        1,
> > >                                        4,
> > >                                        6,
> > >                                        112,
> > >                                        117,
> > >                                        98,
> > >                                        108,
> > >                                        105,
> > >                                        99,
> > >                                        167,
> > >                                        52,
> > >                                        2,
> > >                                        1,
> > >                                        2,
> > >                                        2,
> > >                                        1,
> > >                                        0|...]}} **
> > >
> > > Could someone shed some light on this??  Is this the trap, as
> > > i can see
> > > no correllation between this, and what should have been sent
> > > back ?? So
> > > is it an error message??
> > >
> > > Am i not creating the trap correctly ?. I am creating the
> > > trap in a Java
> > > program / Agent .
> > >
> > > Tia Adrian
> > >
> > 
> > NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER:
> > This email (including attachments) is confidential.  If you 
> have received
> > this email in error please notify the sender immediately 
> and delete this
> > email from your system without copying or disseminating it 
> or placing any
> > reliance upon its contents.  We cannot accept liability for 
> any breaches of
> > confidence arising through use of email.  Any opinions 
> expressed in this
> > email (including attachments) are those of the author and 
> do not necessarily
> > reflect our opinions.  We will not accept responsibility 
> for any commitments
> > made by our employees outside the scope of our business.  
> We do not warrant
> > the accuracy or completeness of such information.
> 



NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER:
This email (including attachments) is confidential.  If you have received
this email in error please notify the sender immediately and delete this
email from your system without copying or disseminating it or placing any
reliance upon its contents.  We cannot accept liability for any breaches of
confidence arising through use of email.  Any opinions expressed in this
email (including attachments) are those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect our opinions.  We will not accept responsibility for any commitments
made by our employees outside the scope of our business.  We do not warrant
the accuracy or completeness of such information.





More information about the erlang-questions mailing list