etk?
Per Hedeland
per@REDACTED
Tue Feb 1 14:14:19 CET 2000
David Sallach <sallach@REDACTED> wrote:
> The open source FAQ suggests that GUI development should be done with etk
>rather than gs because it is a newer and better package.
Well, I guess that suggestion should really be taken as the opinion of
the FAQ author rather than an "official statement" - but anyway:
> However, I don't
>see documentation for etk, either as a separate document, or in STDLIB. Is
>it a part of R6B?
Actually I posted this just a week ago:-) - here it is again:
In the otp_src_doc_html_R6B-0.tar.gz tarball:
lib/etk-0.9.2/doc/<lotsofstuff>
(also online at
http://www.erlang.org/documentation/lib/etk-0.9.2/doc/index.html) - not
linked from the "main" page, though. In the otp_src_doc_man_R6B-0.tar.gz
tarball:
man/man3/etk.3
man/man3/tk.3
- should be accessible via 'erl -man (e)tk' when you've installed the
man pages.
> Are there any plans for Erlang to support a graphic system not based upon Tk?
I don't know of any such plans for the "standard distribution"
currently, but I believe some users are looking at an interface to gtk+.
--Per Hedeland
per@REDACTED
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list