[erlang-patches] trivial bug in jinterface
Fri Feb 1 11:37:15 CET 2013
It already is on master (but I just had some git issues, so you might have
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Fredrik <> wrote:
> On 02/01/2013 11:13 AM, Nico Kruber wrote:
>> On Friday 01 Feb 2013 09:58:54 Vlad Dumitrescu wrote:
>>> I found a small problem in jinterface. It has been around for a while
>>> it happens in a corner case that probably nobody ever uses.
>>> In OtpErlangTuple(**OtpErlangObject, int, int), when the size of the
>>> used is 0, then the elems fields remains uninitialized, it is the
>>> that gets assigned.
>>> I used master as base, I hope it's still possible to do that.
>>> git fetch git://github.com/vladdu/otp.**git<http://github.com/vladdu/otp.git>tuple_constructor_bug
>>> Given that there are no other tests for jinterface at this level, do you
>>> want me to write one for this case?
>>> best regards,
>> your branch is outdated so the diff is not clean, i.e. contains a lot of
>> -> please rebase your branch
>> see https://github.com/erlang/otp/**wiki/Submitting-patches<https://github.com/erlang/otp/wiki/Submitting-patches>
>> it would probably also be good to base it on maint - but someone from the
>> team needs to decide here :)
>> your commit though seems reasonable
>> erlang-patches mailing list
> Just rebase it on master will work fine for me.
> BR Fredrik Gustafsson
> Erlang OTP Team
> erlang-patches mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-patches