[erlang-patches] Fix some crashes within debugger handling breaks

Ahmed Omar <>
Wed Mar 14 20:17:33 CET 2012


No problem
yes i already had it changed to =:=, and was about to ask for refetch :)
Now i will delete my branch to avoid confusion
Thanks

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Dan Gudmundsson <> wrote:

> Thanks for the patch.
>
> But I've already made the patch which is in testing in our internal
> nightly builds.
> Sorry about that extra work for you, it is my fault I have not taken
> the time to merge
> that into maint/master branch.
>
> My patch also includes a testcase which provokes the issue.
> Please in future provide tests for the bugs or features supplied.
>
> /Dan
> PS: It always better to use =:= instead of == when not comparing numbers.
>
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Ahmed Omar <> wrote:
> > Please note it  was also reported before by Ricardo Catalinas Jiménez
> > http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-bugs/2012-February/002760.html
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Ahmed Omar <>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> git fetch https://github.com/spawnthink/otp.git
> >> fix_debugger_breaks_crashes
> >>
> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/spawnthink/otp/compare/erlang:maint...spawnthink:fix_debugger_breaks_crashes
> >>
> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/spawnthink/otp/compare/erlang:maint...spawnthink:fix_debugger_breaks_crashes.patch
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > erlang-patches mailing list
> > 
> > http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-patches
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-patches/attachments/20120314/c004cda0/attachment.html>


More information about the erlang-patches mailing list