[erlang-bugs] error in re:split on R14B02 and R14B03

Patrick Baggett baggett.patrick@REDACTED
Wed Jun 8 05:26:12 CEST 2011


Maybe it is compiler options / optimizations producing wrong code? I'd make
100% sure all *.o files are gone and then retry with a debug build. Other
than that, I don't know what to tell you. :\

On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Dave Peticolas <dave.peticolas@REDACTED>wrote:

> I should mention it works fine on my Linux desktop as well.
> I'd say something was wrong with my netbook, except 01
> works just fine.
>
>
> 2011/6/7 Patrick Baggett <baggett.patrick@REDACTED>
>
>> Not seeing it here (Win32 platform)
>>
>> Erlang R14B03 (erts-5.8.4) [smp:4:4] [rq:4] [async-threads:0]
>>
>> Eshell V5.8.4  (abort with ^G)
>> 1> re:split("abc","b").
>> [<<"a">>,<<"c">>]
>> 2>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Dave Peticolas <dave.peticolas@REDACTED
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hello, I recently tried to build both R14B02 and 03 on my Dell Inspiron
>>> Mini (Intel Atom)
>>> running Ubuntu 8.04. I already had R14B01 running fine. I found that
>>> re:split no longer
>>> worked. I built all the versions from source. Here is an example of 01
>>> output:
>>>
>>> Erlang R14B01 (erts-5.8.2) [source] [smp:2:2] [rq:2] [async-threads:0]
>>> [hipe] [kernel-poll:false]
>>>
>>> Eshell V5.8.2  (abort with ^G)
>>> 1> re:split("abc", "b").
>>> [<<"a">>,<<"c">>]
>>> 2> q().
>>> ok
>>>
>>>
>>> And here is what I get on 02 (same as 03 except for the version numbers):
>>>
>>> Erlang R14B02 (erts-5.8.3) [source] [smp:2:2] [rq:2] [async-threads:0]
>>> [hipe] [kernel-poll:false]
>>>
>>> Eshell V5.8.3  (abort with ^G)
>>> 1> re:split("abc", "b").
>>> ** exception error: no case clause matching {match,["b"]}
>>>      in function  re:run/3
>>>         called as re:run(<<"abc">>,
>>>                          {re_pattern,0,0,
>>>
>>>  <<69,82,67,80,49,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,98,0,0,...>>},
>>>                          [global])
>>>      in call from re:split/3
>>> 2>
>>>
>>> In case the existing build was somehow getting tangled with the new one,
>>> I tried removing the 01 build completely and rebuilding 02 and got the
>>> same
>>> results.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> dave
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> erlang-bugs mailing list
>>> erlang-bugs@REDACTED
>>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-bugs
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-bugs/attachments/20110607/40add683/attachment.htm>


More information about the erlang-bugs mailing list