[eeps] Multi-Parameter Typechecking BIFs

mats cronqvist <>
Thu Feb 19 16:21:58 CET 2009


James Hague <> writes:

>> I'm a little unhappy with the grammar of it:
>>        X1 and ... and Xn is T?
>> Shouldn't that be are_T(., ...)?
>
> I wish Erlang hadn't gone down the road of adding "is_" prefixes.

  IIRC, there were some unfortunate clashes with BIFs (e.g. float()).

  mats



More information about the eeps mailing list