[eeps] Multi-Parameter Typechecking BIFs

James Hague <>
Thu Feb 19 15:26:17 CET 2009


> I'm a little unhappy with the grammar of it:
>        X1 and ... and Xn is T?
> Shouldn't that be are_T(., ...)?

I wish Erlang hadn't gone down the road of adding "is_" prefixes.
After all, it's "length(L)" not "length_of(L)".  But it's water under
the bridge so we live with it.  That said, the grammatical side of
this doesn't bother me.



More information about the eeps mailing list