[eeps] EEP 9
Tue Mar 4 17:55:43 CET 2008
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 17:32 +0100, Ulf Wiger (TN/EAB) wrote:
> Raimo Niskanen skrev:
> > EEP 9 is recognized by the EEP editor(s).
> > http://www.erlang.org/eeps/
> As a general comment, I'm very much in favour of this.
> What should be the procedure for reviewing this EEP?
> There are lots of details in there, each of which
> could be brought up for debate.
> Perhaps we could first agree on whether or not it's
> a good idea, modulo various changes to the proposed
> function set?
I sent initial comments to erlang-questions, rather than the eeps list,
so yes, how and where to discuss?
I'd suggest that beyond an overall "good idea" decision, we focus
discussions threads on each function individually (e.g. "eeps9: match
More information about the eeps