[eeps] EEP 9

Ulf Wiger (TN/EAB) <>
Tue Mar 4 17:32:35 CET 2008

Raimo Niskanen skrev:
> EEP 9 is recognized by the EEP editor(s).
> http://www.erlang.org/eeps/

As a general comment, I'm very much in favour of this.

What should be the procedure for reviewing this EEP?
There are lots of details in there, each of which
could be brought up for debate.

Perhaps we could first agree on whether or not it's
a good idea, modulo various changes to the proposed
function set?

Ulf W

More information about the eeps mailing list