New EEP draft: Pinning operator ^ in patterns
Thu Jan 28 16:01:10 CET 2021
On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:19:56 +0200
Valentin Micic <v@REDACTED> wrote:
> 3) Straw-man argument — establishing a relationship with “failed” programming language, thus establishing undue inferences;
Some say SmallTalk failed, because of the need to
"build a release" ... well, Erlang, with its releases,
has evidently not.
> 4) Non sequitur — it does not follow that accepting or rejecting one or another form of a particular syntax would jeopardise the future of Erlang.
A few fly-droppings break up the "text-area" and guide the eye,
too many and ...
I already have difficulties keeping `=>` and `:=` apart,
though I do know and understand them.
(ROK once mentioned difficulties
in keeping single and double arrows apart ...)
I do not think it is completely subjective and would admit
some "sequitur", but in the opposite direction.
¡Menos economia! - ¡Mas econotuya!
Less economy! - More econoyou!
More information about the erlang-questions