erlang:cancel_timer/1

[Nalin Ranjan]

Sorry for the typo. ��

नमस्ते।
नलिन रंजन

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021, 2:43 PM Nalin Ranjan <ranjanified@REDACTED> wrote:

> Hi Frank,
> I also tried putting these sequences into an
>

escript

but not reproducing for me.
>
> I am running latest master.
>
> Should I try in emulator manually?��
>
> नमस्ते।
> नलिन रंजन
>
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021, 8:43 PM <empro2@REDACTED> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 10:55:53 +0100
>> Eric PAILLEAU <eric.pailleau@REDACTED> wrote:
>>
>> > >         Try to forget f(TRef) between 3> and 4>?
>>
>> ??! Untie then bind again? `% TRef + bondage = ok`?
>> What would it matter to the (evil, shoo!, shoo!) proc. dict.?
>>
>> And: How get the _same_ #Ref in two different shells (erts?)?
>>
>>
>> And a note:
>> Your mail clients seems to have added strange tel: numbers in the quote
>> below: html tag confusion?
>>
>>
>> > >         Or use a pinning operator.
>>
>> Is it not more of a pointing annotation, much the same like any boundie
>> in itself, which in pattern context look like unboundies ...?
>> ("boundie" = short, light version of "bound variable", "unboundie" = ...)
>>
>>     ~Michael
>>
>>
>> Thread rep.:
>>
>> > >         Why this works?
>> [...]
>> > >         But this doesn’t:
>> > >
>> > >         Erlang/OTP 22 [erts-10.7.2.5 <http://10.7.2.5>] [source]
>> > >         [64-bit] [smp:12:12] [ds:12:12:10] [async-threads:1]
>> > >         Eshell V10.7.2.5 <http://10.7.2.5>  (abort with ^G)
>> > >         1> self().
>> > >         <0.89.0 <tel:0.89.0>>
>> > >
>> > >         2> TRef = erlang:send_after(9000, self(), die).
>> > >         #Ref<0.2349067310.4021813252.2
>> <tel:0.2349067310.4021813252.2>981>
>> > >
>> > >         3> erlang:put(die_tref, TRef).
>> > >         undefined
>> > >
>> > >         4> TRef = erlang:get(die_tref).
>> > >         #Ref<0.2349067310.4021813252.2
>> <tel:0.2349067310.4021813252.2>981>
>> > >
>> > >         5> erlang:cancel_timer(TRef).
>> > >         false          <------------------ hmmm
>> > >
>> > >         6> self().
>> > >         <0.89.0 <tel:0.89.0>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Normality is merely a question of quantity,
>> not of quality.
>>
>> Normalität ist nur eine Frage von Quantität,
>> nicht von Qualität.
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20210126/0bbd238e/attachment.htm>