New EEP draft: Pinning operator ^ in patterns

[Valentin Micic]

My apology if this sounds patronising to some.

At this point it is very difficult to follow this debate.

Why don’t we all park this discussion for a bit?
Let’s all cool down, and re-engage in a week.

Kind regards

V/


> On 22 Jan 2021, at 15:14, Richard Carlsson <carlsson.richard@REDACTED> wrote:
> 
> Den fre 22 jan. 2021 kl 13:23 skrev zxq9 <zxq9@REDACTED <mailto:zxq9@REDACTED>>:
> I absolutely believe that Raimo and Richard are acting in good faith.
> They both care about Erlang and have put a lot into it over the years.
> 
> I disagree with this change on principle and in the face of what I view 
> as a more consistent alternative direction. I also disagree with how 
> this discussion is being framed.
> 
> The framing, assumptions, and what appears to be somewhat opaque 
> procedure is the rub, not the idea that someone came up with a proposal 
> for how to patch over one of the few warts in the language.
> 
> Thank you, Craig. 
> 
>         /Richard 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20210122/655e8259/attachment.htm>