Erlang forums (was Re: PING TEST)

[Vyacheslav Levytskyy]

Erlang forums look more noisy, and, paradoxically, it's an advantage. 
For me it's easier to create not so important posts there, communicate 
and feel better connected with the community. Hopefully, some good 
findings are to materialize from such approach.
On the other hand, I need and appreciate this mailing list, where 
listening is more rewarding to me than talking. Don't see the point in 
choosing between the mailing list and forums.

Merry Xmas everyone.
Vyacheslav

On 24.12.2021 14:29, Leonard B wrote:
> I'm honestly surprised there has been no offer from EEF to
> handle/control/manage both the forum and the ML.
>
> Surely that would be the 'correct' group now that it is established?
> Possibly as a function of Marketing WG?
>
> KInd regards,
> Leonard
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 3:55 AM Frank Muller <frank.muller.erl@REDACTED> wrote:
>> Talked to my boss and he’s ok to support the mailing list costs (hosting, server, etc).
>>
>> OTP team will have full admin access.
>> Let me know if interested by the offer.
>>
>> Merry Xmas
>> /Frank
>>
>>> Merry Xmas and happy new year to every Erlanger.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 7:55 AM Max Lapshin <max.lapshin@REDACTED> wrote:
>>>> It would be a pity to lose this mailing list.
>>>>
>>>> I consider that it is more time-proof than discourse forum, maintained
>>>> by some people, who do not earn money from it.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 5:22 PM Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@REDACTED> wrote:
>>>>>> On Dec 23, 2021, at 3:29 AM, Richard O'Keefe <raoknz@REDACTED> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> gmail mistakes a surprising amount
>>>>>> of Erlang e-mail as spam, so I have to trawl my spam box more
>>>>>> often than I wish to or I miss things.
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL spam filters! Mine has never mistagged erlang list email as spam. Instead, it targets postgresql list emails.
>>>>>