Dialyzer: Cons will produce an improper list since its 2nd argument is none()
Fernando Benavides
elbrujohalcon@REDACTED
Fri Feb 14 13:54:13 CET 2020
I think what's happening in this case is this…
Dialyzer sees your code (using cons for the list) as…
main() -> [ #foo{x = 0} | [#foo{x = false} | []] ].
It then detects the third warning from your email (namely, that you're
using *false* for something that should be an *integer*):
foo.erl:9: Record construction
#foo{x :: false} violates the declared type of field x ::
integer()
Therefore, the type of that second part of the list ([#foo{x = false} |
[]]) will be *none()*.
And that leads dialyzer to complain with the second warning that you see…
foo.erl:8: Cons will produce an improper list since its 2nd argument is
none()
Which, in time, produces the first warning…
foo.erl:7: Function main/0 has no local return
Hope this helps.
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 1:45 PM Jesper Eskilson <jesper.eskilson@REDACTED>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When dialyzer analyzes this program:
>
>
> -module(foo).
> -export([main/0]).
> -record(foo, {x :: integer()}).
> main() ->
> [ #foo{x = 0},
> #foo{x = false} ].
>
>
> it says:
>
> foo.erl:7: Function main/0 has no local return
> foo.erl:8: Cons will produce an improper list since its 2nd argument is
> none()
> foo.erl:9: Record construction
> #foo{x :: false} violates the declared type of field x ::
> integer()
>
>
> It seems like dialyzer assumes that any cons with second argument not
> being a list will produce an improper list, but shouldn't it treat "none()"
> differently?
>
> Is this a bug in dialyzer, or a feature whose usefulness I am unable to
> grasp?
>
> --
>
> *Jesper Eskilson*
> Senior Software Engineer
> Kred Core
> +46-72-855-8421
>
> Klarna Bank AB (publ)
> Sveavägen 46, 111 34 Stockholm
> Tel: +46 8 120 120 00 <+46812012000>
> Reg no: 556737-0431
> klarna.com
>
>
--
<https://about.me/elbrujohalcon?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb>
Brujo Benavides
about.me/elbrujohalcon
<https://about.me/elbrujohalcon?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20200214/d690d9e3/attachment.htm>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list