[erlang-questions] String representations of floating point numbers
Bob Ippolito
bob@REDACTED
Sat Mar 16 01:52:31 CET 2019
There’s a typo in that regex, the exponent part is optional of course.
[+-]?\d+[.,]\d+([eE][+-]?\d+)?
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 17:32 Bob Ippolito <bob@REDACTED> wrote:
> If you dive into the implementation it's effectively a wrapper around
> strtod from C with a validation pass that is more strict than the strtod
> standard.
>
>
> https://github.com/erlang/otp/blob/OTP-21.3/erts/emulator/sys/win32/sys_float.c#L54
>
> https://github.com/erlang/otp/blob/OTP-21.3/erts/emulator/sys/unix/sys_float.c#L732
>
> So as far as a regex goes it would be something like this:
>
> [+-]?\d+[.,]\d+([eE][+-]?\d+)
>
> The major differences between this and other popular float grammars are:
>
> * At least one digit is required in each part
> * Both integer and fractional parts are required, even if there's an
> exponent part (so "1", ".1", "1e-1" would not be valid)
> * The decimal separator is either , or . (the implementation will try the
> other if necessary to compensate for a different locale)
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 3:52 PM Hugo Mills <hugo@REDACTED> wrote:
>
>> Where in the manual is the set of allowable string representations
>> of floating point numbers documented? I'd have expected it to be here:
>>
>> http://erlang.org/doc/reference_manual/data_types.html
>>
>> ... but apparently not.
>>
>> Specifically, I'm trying to use list_to_float/1, and I've been
>> trying to reverse engineer it:
>>
>> 1> list_to_float("-1").
>> ** exception error: bad argument
>> in function list_to_float/1
>> called as list_to_float("-1")
>> 2> list_to_float("-1.0").
>> -1.0
>> 3> list_to_float("-1.0e-23").
>> -1.0e-23
>> 4> list_to_float("-1e-23").
>> ** exception error: bad argument
>> in function list_to_float/1
>> called as list_to_float("-1e-23")
>> 5> list_to_float(".3").
>> ** exception error: bad argument
>> in function list_to_float/1
>> called as list_to_float(".3")
>>
>> An actual written specification would be really handy here. Even
>> just a regex or EBNF for them. I'm writing a parser for something
>> where the definition of floating point literals isn't quite the same
>> as Erlang's, and it's a bit painful.
>>
>> Hugo.
>>
>> --
>> Hugo Mills | Your problem is that you've got too much taste
>> to be
>> hugo@REDACTED carfax.org.uk | a web developer.
>> http://carfax.org.uk/ |
>> PGP: E2AB1DE4 | Steve
>> Harris
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>> iQIbBAEBAgAGBQJcjCyYAAoJEFheFHXiqx3kBo8P+KYpzGUmaV4lA8jopR5h39S8
>> XMt6e+mO4zceiz1LE9mGFozayPPgPlchuJz3h/9EgtvNKXV8AvUGLFOZHtcE5qeM
>> wDwQg6kreHW/5ejrpYFCH1rZt9DftnAzMQo0SXOCQTfLkAC5W/jRrZyAE8ibVEH+
>> JoAOG/ZRUTz4E3bnoSGfcrY13IwD5A3sJ3Jex6rLttVjJyfCEbBJMx5ofFXO9WbY
>> PfggXSD7EALHdUOT1vQWJsRiJClq25HjAucblA+zst/8N1wllpRnK3uhA1M22lNB
>> OuYv0lnvKwYmyNSs/VcXRAne5CXjpf/CxJpVMuvXdbRYxrlsybWz9+UWMk7DB+TA
>> fQvCRIGROG/DlVWo8KAoMN6ZgfxE3pmVjfN3p2usDza2V43QAY+jaZF7x2SyxKxo
>> Bw4/jW7RODduzWu/XQvRX0780RQlbPbNcFjrOHIt3PZe7+Qtl++6QQcVCJ+TrE8h
>> 1drKkbFvm2/ecyAXdMkXV8CxiJdbgcSkz2kgIYhTUpiGJz0ubCt3HOA/byh3P8em
>> /5EhxuQQo5r+Yvn4rHkOIe2KBJuBHHhNky9f8xRU7j9JnxFvm6tQK8tJ4C3fIklI
>> yua+T9thS3XifUNiWTw/WX6CjSYVl2/lFtmzXYZ5+LiZgd4IImEHnXik/jOv/2eC
>> ayHhzl8YuA1yxsjULsw=
>> =Y3WO
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> _______________________________________________
>> erlang-questions mailing list
>> erlang-questions@REDACTED
>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20190315/ec65fd4d/attachment.htm>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list