[erlang-questions] erl_parse vs erl_syntax difference

[Karlo Kuna]

this is great news
thanks for quick fix

On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 9:58 AM Hans Bolinder <hans.bolinder@REDACTED>
wrote:

> [Karlo Kuna:]
> > for example if we parse form (i'm omitting scan pass here)
> > "-type a() :: tuple()."  we get
> {ok,{attribute,1,type,{a,{type,1,tuple,any},[]}}}
> >
> > interesting part here is:
> >      {type,1,tuple,any}
> >
> > as far as i can see there no method how to construct valid tuple or
> > map type annotations using erl_syntax. Specifically if one construct
> > type annotation for tuple and use erl_syntax:revert/1 one gets:
> >
> >       {type,1,tuple,any_size}
> >
> > any_size =/= any
> >
> > is this a bug??
>
> Thanks for pointing it out. A fix, see commit 1b91284, will be
> included in Erlang/OTP 21.1.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Hans Bolinder, Erlang/OTP team, Ericsson
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20180914/beccf5b0/attachment.htm>