[erlang-questions] map elements in defined order

Benoit Chesneau bchesneau@REDACTED
Sun Nov 5 17:44:34 CET 2017



> On 30 Oct 2017, at 01:16, Richard A. O'Keefe <ok@REDACTED> wrote:
> 
> For term_to_binary/2, of course the result
> depends on the Options argument, but I take
> it now that even being explicit about the
> Options is not enough.  Can we have a
> 'canonical' option?
> 

+1 . That would be an awesome option :)

- benoit



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list