[erlang-questions] erl_tracer optional callbacks
Mon Feb 6 21:32:07 CET 2017
> On 6 Feb 2017, at 21:05, Loïc Hoguin <essen@REDACTED> wrote:
> I have been studying erl_tracer a little, and will start using it tomorrow.
Great! Hope it is useful!
> There's one thing I can't understand.
> What's the rationale behind having both a trace/enabled set of functions, and then equivalent functions with smaller scope? When would I want to use one of the smaller functions?
> Is it an optimization, so fewer atom values need to be checked every time?
> Loïc Hoguin
> erlang-questions mailing list
More information about the erlang-questions