[erlang-questions] Releases and Different OSs

[Andrew Berman]

So you're saying to download a binary of Erlang compiled on Linux and put
it on my Mac and then have it include that when building the release tar?

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 5:55 PM Vincent A Okonkwo <codmajik@REDACTED>
wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
>
> Been awhile since I tried this but if you are using relx there is
> a --include-erts=$PATH_TO_EXTRACTED_LINUX_ERTS ( {include_erts,
> $PATH_TO_EXTRACTED_LINUX_ERTS} for rebar) that you can use
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:42 AM Andrew Berman <rexxe98@REDACTED> wrote:
>
>> Hi List,
>>
>> So today I tried to create a release using rebar3 from my Mac and deploy
>> it to a CentOS box.  Everything works when I do not include ERTS (and have
>> Erlang installed on the target), but if I do include ERTS, things fail
>> (can't run run_erl), I'm assuming because the Mac version of Erlang can't
>> be run on CentOS, which makes sense.  So, I wanted to know how people do
>> deployments of their Erlang releases.  Do you set up boxes with each OS
>> that matches your target OS and compile on there, including ERTS in the
>> release?  Do you not include ERTS and make sure that all your Erlang
>> installs are the exact same version?   Just trying to figure out a good
>> workflow.
>>
>> Thanks for any advice!
>>
>> Andrew
>>
> _______________________________________________
>> erlang-questions mailing list
>> erlang-questions@REDACTED
>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20160518/23596175/attachment.htm>