[erlang-questions] Can't make dirty schedulers work on a certain VPS
John Doe
donpedrothird@REDACTED
Mon Aug 15 01:20:02 CEST 2016
Also
1> erlang:system_info(cpu_topology).
[{processor,{logical,0}}]
2> erlang:system_info(logical_processors).
1
3> erlang:system_info(smp_support).
false
Looks like the build has no smp support at all, thought it was configured
with --enable-smp-support
uname -a
Linux debian-512mb-ams2-01 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.2.81-1 x86_64
GNU/Linux
2016-08-15 2:08 GMT+03:00 Steve Vinoski <vinoski@REDACTED>:
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 6:38 PM, John Doe <donpedrothird@REDACTED> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> got a very strange problem today on a Debian 7.11, gcc 4.7.2 VPS - all
>> apps with dirty schedulers nifs fail with "{error, {bad_lib, xxx requires
>> a runtime with dirty scheduler support."}}"
>>
>> The erlang is built by
>> KERL_CONFIGURE_OPTIONS="--disable-dynamic-ssl-lib --with-ssl=/usr/
>> --enable-smp-support --without-termcap --enable-dirty-schedulers
>> --enable-builtin-zlib" ./kerl build git https://github.com/erlang/otp.git
>> OTP-19.0.4 OTP-19.0.4
>>
>> This is not problem of the apps, all the apps fail with the same error, I
>> tried https://github.com/vinoski/bitwise and a couple of other.
>>
>> There are no problems altogether with the same apps and the same OTP
>> built with the same command on my home box. Anyway, i tried to build erlang
>> with other flags and with no kerl, nothing changed.
>>
>> What could be the reason for that?
>>
>
> I think the only way you can get that error message is if the runtime is
> not actually compiled with dirty schedulers enabled. Are you sure you're
> picking up the right runtime via your path? When you start an erlang shell,
> does the status line include something like
>
> [smp:8:8] [ds:8:8:10]
>
> or is the "ds" part missing? What do you get if you execute the following
> in the erlang shell?
>
> erlang:system_info(dirty_cpu_schedulers).
>
> --steve
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20160815/f8ae4b8b/attachment.htm>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list