[erlang-questions] Erlang tracing
Mon Sep 21 13:25:18 CEST 2015
I had a vaguely related idea the other day. When you trace a
function that takes an anonymous function as an argument, it's
printed like this:
8> lists:all(foo:foo(3), [1, 2]).
(<0.33.0>) call lists:all(#Fun<foo.0.99124727>,[1,2])
(<0.33.0>) returned from lists:all/2 -> false
That tells you that anonymous function number 0 in module foo is
passed as an argument. It would be convenient to have the 0 be
the line number where the anonymous function is defined instead,
so you can quickly figure out exactly which function is being
passed, in case your module creates several different ones.
More information about the erlang-questions