[erlang-questions] Porint erlang on rumpkernel

[Neeraj Sharma]

I have completed the first phase of erlang on rumprun port.

I have intentionally reverted all my changes (except one for the ssl
build-script) in-line with the remove-till-you-cant-take-away philosophy
and additionally avoid maintenance overhead. Having said that the second
phase would see those changes though.

At present there is no epmd, no smp, while it does have crypto and ssl. I
was in the dilemma to go via ose way or *nix, but then the comment stating
ose being unsupported made that choice a bit easier though not from porting
point of view.

https://www.freelists.org/post/rumpkernel-users/Erlang-on-rumprun


-Neeraj

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Neeraj Sharma <neerajsharma.live@REDACTED>
wrote:

> Thanks Lukas and Motiejus.
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Motiejus Jakštys <desired.mta@REDACTED>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Neeraj Sharma
>> <neerajsharma.live@REDACTED> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I am trying to port erlang on rumpkernel and running into some issues.
>> > RumpKernel do not have fork/execve, so there are some constraints.
>> Please
>> > note that I am new to erlang internals, so please be a bit more verbose.
>>
>> Hi, Neeraj,
>>
>> Erlang was recently ported to OSv, which also doesn't have fork(). Might
>> help:
>>
>> * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tz1TWwc9KhQ
>> * https://github.com/cloudius-systems/osv-apps/tree/master/erlang
>>
>> Good luck!
>>
>> Motiejus
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20150903/4f9ef8df/attachment.htm>