[erlang-questions] PropEr after test clean up
Hynek Vychodil
vychodil.hynek@REDACTED
Mon May 25 17:11:34 CEST 2015
Hi,
I bumped in the problem how clean up after property in PropEr. Let's have
simple property where I make ets table:
prop_ets() ->
?FORALL(V, integer(),
begin
E = ets:new(),
true = ets:insert(T, {V, ok}),
equals([{V, ok}], ets:lookup(T, V))
end
).
How am I supposed to delete ets table? It is trickier than looks like. The
problem is when I want use another ?FORALL inside my property. The
conjunction/1 is the same problem. You can`t write
prop_ets() ->
?FORALL(V, integer(),
begin
E = ets:new(),
true = ets:insert(T, {V, ok}),
Res = conjunction([{lookup, equals([{V, ok}], ets:lookup(T,
V))},
{lookup_element,
equals(ok, ets:lookup_element(T, V, 2))}]),
ets:delete(T),
Res
end
).
Because Res is test(). In this case, you can make calls to the ets:lookup/2
and the ets:lookup_element/3 before conjunction/1 but it doesn't solve
properties like
?FORALL(L, list(...),
begin
T = ets:new(),
...
?FORALL(V, oneof(L),
...
)
end
)
The solution would be simple is every test case would be run in a separate
process, but it is not! It is very unusual in Erlang word to make such
thing. Processes are cheap and I can they are in a defined state each run
for free. Why is it all running in the same process?
Has anybody solved this problem somehouw?
Hynek Vychodil
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20150525/02e33c9b/attachment.htm>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list