[erlang-questions] Merging maps with a fun like dict:merge/3
Hynek Vychodil
vychodil.hynek@REDACTED
Wed Aug 26 11:32:00 CEST 2015
I would consider:
merge_ap(F, [Head | Tail]) ->
lists:foldl(fun(Y, X) ->
maps:merge(X, maps:map(fun(Key, Value) ->
case maps:find(Key,
X) of
{ok, V} ->
F(Key, V, Value);
error -> Value
end
end,
Y))
end,
Head,
Tail).
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Ivan Uemlianin <ivan@REDACTED> wrote:
> Dear Alexander
>
> Thanks! That looks excellent!
>
> I notice that your function F is different from the dict:merge/3
> function: instead of taking a key and the two values, is takes two values,
> defaulting the first to 0.
>
> I've put my case clause into your framework:
>
> merge_ap(F, [Head | Tail]) ->
> lists:foldl(fun(Y, X) ->
> maps:merge(X, maps:map(fun(Key, Value) ->
> case
> maps:is_key(Key, X) of
> false ->
> Value;
> true ->
> F(Key,
> Value, maps:get(Key, X))
> end
> end,
> Y))
> end,
> Head,
> Tail).
>
> This has desired behaviour, and will probably still perform well. Using
> lists:foldl is a brilliant idea.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Ivan
>
>
>
> On 26/08/2015 09:16, Alexander Petrovsky wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I've make some little benchmarks, and noticed that the most effective way
> is:
>
> merge(F, [Head | Tail]) ->
> lists:foldl(fun(Y, X) -> maps:merge(X, maps:map(fun(Key, Value) -> F(
> maps:get(Key, X, 0), Value) end, Y)) end, Head, Tail).
>
>
> 2015-08-23 20:05 GMT+03:00 Ivan Uemlianin <ivan@REDACTED>:
>
>> Dear All
>>
>> The maps module does not have a merge/3 like dict:merge/3, which calls a
>> function fun(Key, Val1, Val2) when both dicts have the same key. From the
>> documentation, "If a key occurs in both dictionaries then Fun is called
>> with the key and both values to return a new value."
>>
>> The dict documentation says that dict:merge/3 is faster than an
>> equivalent implemented in erlang.
>>
>> http://www.erlang.org/doc/man/dict.html#merge-3
>>
>> Why does the maps module not have a similar merge/3? Is it because
>> writing our own erlang implementation is at fast as it gets?
>>
>> Below is an implementation which seems to work. Can it be made faster?
>>
>>
>> merge_maps(Fun, M1, M2) ->
>> maps:fold(fun(K, V1, Acc) ->
>> case maps:is_key(K, Acc) of
>> false ->
>> maps:put(K, V1, Acc);
>> true ->
>> V2 = maps:get(K, Acc),
>> maps:put(K, Fun(K, V1, V2), Acc)
>> end
>> end,
>> M1,
>> M2).
>>
>> merge_maps_test() ->
>> merge_maps(fun(_K, V1, V2) -> V1 + V2 end,
>> #{a => 1, b => 2, c => 3},
>> #{b => 2, c => 3, d => 4}) =:=
>> #{a => 1, b => 4, c => 6, d => 4}.
>>
>>
>> With thanks and best wishes
>>
>> Ivan
>>
>> --
>> ============================================================
>> Ivan A. Uemlianin PhD
>> Llaisdy
>> Speech Technology Research and Development
>>
>> ivan@REDACTED
>> @llaisdy
>> llaisdy.wordpress.com
>> github.com/llaisdy
>> www.linkedin.com/in/ivanuemlianin
>>
>> festina lente
>> ============================================================
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> erlang-questions mailing list
>> erlang-questions@REDACTED
>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Петровский Александр / Alexander Petrovsky,
>
> Skype: askjuise
> Phone: +7 914 8 820 815
>
>
> --
> ============================================================
> Ivan A. Uemlianin PhD
> Llaisdy
> Speech Technology Research and Development
>
> ivan@REDACTED
> @llaisdy
> llaisdy.wordpress.com
> github.com/llaisdy
> www.linkedin.com/in/ivanuemlianin
>
> festina lente
> ============================================================
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20150826/65c39324/attachment.htm>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list