[erlang-questions] Schedulers go to sleep even with +sfwi 500 option on R16B03

Scott Lystig Fritchie fritchie@REDACTED
Sat Sep 20 06:48:25 CEST 2014

Defnull <define.null@REDACTED> wrote:

> Maybe i should also play with '+sub true' because it have
> similar effect according to docs. Not sure which one will give better
> performance. Does it also eliminate schedule collapse?

Hrm, no idea, I haven't tried it, sorry -- it's new enough that we at
Basho haven't done any evaluation.


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list