Sat Mar 15 17:51:11 CET 2014
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Loïc Hoguin <essen@REDACTED> wrote:
> It's been there for a while, and it's always taking 'process' as first
> argument. Any plans to add anything else?
And if nothing is foreseen before the end of times, any plans to add a
> monitor/1 instead?
Yes, we plan to add erlang:monitor(port,#Port). There are no plans, that I
know of, to introduce an erlang:monitor/1.
Speaking of erlang:monitor, we have also been talking about adding a
erlang:monitor/3 which would as a third argument take the identifier that
you want to be sent back to the caller instead of the current reference. Is
that something which could be useful to anyone?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions