[erlang-questions] No JSON/MAPS interoperability in 17.0?

[Anthony Ramine]

Replied inline.

-- 
Anthony Ramine

Le 14 mars 2014 à 20:59, Raoul Duke <raould@REDACTED> a écrit :

> this sort of situation is never really resolvable as far as i have
> seen. consider naked ocaml vs. ocaml with batteries; consider the
> popularity of java in a large part due to the sdk; consider scala vs.
> scalaz; consider how many different ways there are to effing try to
> effing install any effing library in effing python.
> 
> if you include stuff, you are making the language a lot more amenable
> to newbies, to greater adoption, even if what you end up with in the
> long run is java-esque poop.

How is that a good thing in the long run?

> <snip/>
> 
> i guess if there were something like a non-core-erlang group that made
> their own "stack" for erlang, that would be a way to keep it outside
> the core, yet somehow "standardized ».

Well, anyone is free to try to make one.