[erlang-questions] node.js vs erlang
Loïc Hoguin
essen@REDACTED
Thu Jun 19 01:30:02 CEST 2014
On 06/18/2014 10:22 PM, Kenneth Lundin wrote:
> That is what I meant, you are using a more complex setup with Erlang in
> order to get more features. So the comparision with other languages
> "simple setup" is not fair.
The setup is more complex but the way we get there isn't. Have you read
the getting started chapter[1]? The release part is smaller than it
would take to explain "erl -run" or "erl -s": we don't have to write
extra code for it, we don't have to manually setup paths, we don't have
to deal with reltool, and so on. It's literally "create relx.config, put
this in it, run make again". Bam you got a release. That part can't get
any simpler.
Erlang *is* more complex to use than many other languages (it is still
simpler than C, C++ and the like though). Either you do things manually
by downloading dependencies manually and such, or you use a build system
like erlang.mk (or rebar) to automate things which requires you to
create an OTP application.
Because erlang.mk automates the use of relx to build releases it is
actually simpler to make a release than manually setup paths and
whatnot. We just have to create the one file! We don't deal with reltool
here, creating the release is *really* easier than not.
There's no simpler alternative to all that in the Erlang ecosystem. We
will be able to make it a little simpler by having templates instead of
making the user copy things, but the getting started chapter will not go
down in length dramatically because of this.
We could remove all explanations to make it perhaps half the size it
currently is, but then we removed all explanations. It's a chapter about
getting started, it's supposed to provide initial pointers to users, not
just get them to run an example and then ask themselves "now what?". We
have actual examples for people that want that already.
I am not even sure what triggers all these good comments about the
nodejs documentation. Sure it has a 6 lines and 1 command example on its
front page. There's no denying that. Then what? A link to API docs. I
have *no* idea how people manage to learn how to use it. Surely by using
other resources than these, because while I'm confident I could run the
front page example quickly, I am also confident that's about all I could
do with it for a rather long time until I manage to figure out how to do
anything meaningful, if I were to only use the official docs.
[1] http://ninenines.eu/docs/en/cowboy/HEAD/guide/getting_started/
--
Loïc Hoguin
http://ninenines.eu
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list