[erlang-questions] 0MQ libraries
Fri Jan 31 02:56:42 CET 2014
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014, at 05:24 PM, Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya wrote:
Yeah, you can't trust Tristan__ ...
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Garrett Smith <g@REDACTED> wrote:
Wait! My project doesn't even have a license file. What are we even
talking about here?
CZMQ/0MQ is dual licensed GPL/LGPL. I'll use those, if that's okay
with Tristan. Don't want that guy up in my grill.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya
> 'No License' means that you retain all rights - and also means that
> pretty much unusable by anyone else!
> Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya
> That tall bald Indian guy..
> Google+ | Blog | Twitter | LinkedIn
> On January 30, 2014 at 7:56:47 PM, Garrett Smith (g@REDACTED) wrote:
> How about no license? How do I delete this file?
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Michael Truog <mjtruog@REDACTED>
>> On 01/30/2014 03:15 PM, Tristan Sloughter wrote:
>>> Why would it not allow you to use it in a service because it is
>>> Maybe you are confusing GPLv3 with the AGPL?
>> You are right, originally they wanted to close the service loophole
>> GPLv3, but they didn't, that got closed in AGPLv3. I just try to
>> GPL use due to the various other restrictions on commercial use, so
>> may blur in my mind a bit, since the general direction is meant to
>> closed-source use, though GPLv3 isn't a version that does that for
>> (I am not a lawyer, not giving legal advice... don't sue me)
>> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions mailing list
That tall bald Indian guy..
Google+ | Blog | Twitter | LinkedIn
erlang-questions mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions