[erlang-questions] 0MQ libraries

Benoit Chesneau bchesneau@REDACTED
Fri Jan 31 00:18:56 CET 2014


On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Tristan Sloughter <
tristan.sloughter@REDACTED> wrote:

> Why would it not allow you to use it in a service because it is GPLv3?
> Maybe you are confusing GPLv3 with the AGPL?
>

in a service it is not a problem. It's more likely a problem when you want
to ship your code and make sure it is not polluted by another license.
Which is not possible with the GPL3.

- benoit

>
> --
>   Tristan Sloughter
>   tristan.sloughter@REDACTED
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014, at 02:19 PM, Garrett Smith wrote:
> > > Yes, but https://github.com/gar1t/erlang-czmq has a GPLv3 license,
> while
> > > https://github.com/zeromq/erlzmq2 has a BSD license, so that can also
> affect
> > > the choice.  erlang-czmq appears impossible to use in any commercial
> way,
> > > including in a service (due to it being v3 of the GPL).  So, that is a
> > > concern, aside from it being slow.  Though, I am not a lawyer, I am not
> > > giving legal advice.
> >
> > This was not a deliberate decision -- I'm happy to change it :)
> >
> > Suggestions?
> > _______________________________________________
> > erlang-questions mailing list
> > erlang-questions@REDACTED
> > http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20140131/fb827dfb/attachment.htm>


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list