[erlang-questions] 0MQ libraries

Michael Truog mjtruog@REDACTED
Thu Jan 30 23:46:28 CET 2014

On 01/30/2014 02:22 PM, Garrett Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Benoit Chesneau <bchesneau@REDACTED> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Garrett Smith <g@REDACTED> wrote:
>>> Speed kills.
>> What do you mean? I like better to have a stable solution? How did you
>> benchmarked it?
> We are in agreement on stability :)
> There's a benchmark tool in the library.
> Garrett
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
I guess your concerns about stability are confusing.  The main issues are bugs within the ZeroMQ source code:

The LIBZMQ-496 was fixed in 3.2.3 while LIBZMQ-478 remains unresolved.  I see no reason to doubt the stability of erlzmq2, since these errors are handled in a way that causes no instability within the Erlang VM.  The erlzmq2 is using a separate thread, so it doesn't have the Erlang scheduler lock-up issue that remains a problem for all long-running NIF/BIF functions.

So, what instability are you referring to?

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list