[erlang-questions] Reltool anyone?
Mon Aug 18 16:44:02 CEST 2014
Yea, same way as reltool basically.
The include_erts config option takes either true, false or a path to the
location of the erts to include:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Loïc Hoguin <essen@REDACTED> wrote:
> Hijacking this thread, can relx build releases for different target
> platforms? Like being on Linux and building OSX and Windows releases?
> On 08/18/2014 04:29 PM, Dmitry Kolesnikov wrote:
>> I am sharing your sarcasm… however, these tools fulfils my requirments
>> (defined in previous email).
>> If you know a better solution to address them, I’d be glad to look on it.
>> - Dmitry
>> On 18 Aug 2014, at 16:07, Tristan Sloughter <tristan.sloughter@REDACTED
>> <mailto:tristan.sloughter@REDACTED>> wrote:
>>> I found reltool + rebar + Makefile is perfect approach to address
>>> those requirements. These tools gives you enough customisation
>>> power with very simple semantic.
>>> I never thought I'd see the word perfect and rebar, reltool or
>>> Makefile in the same sentence :)
>> erlang-questions mailing list
> Loïc Hoguin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions