[erlang-questions] On Pull Requests Comments

Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya mahesh@REDACTED
Tue Oct 22 14:25:32 CEST 2013

"What Steve Said"

Seriously, I too am a big +1 for the PRs.  
Most of the (minor) complaining that I've heard tends to stem around "make it even better", which really isn't a reason to eliminate this...


Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya
That Tall Bald Indian Guy...
Google+  | Blog   | Twitter  | LinkedIn

On Oct 22, 2013, at 8:09 AM, Steve Vinoski <vinoski@REDACTED> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Björn-Egil Dahlberg <egil@REDACTED> wrote:
> Are PR's as bad as Anthony points out? Should we kill it and use mails only?
> No, please please don't do that. I'm a big +1 for PRs -- IMO they work much better than previous approaches, and I've heard similar positive opinions from a number of coworkers and from folks at recent Erlang meetups in the US and Europe.
> --steve
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20131022/73728e91/attachment.htm>

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list