[erlang-questions] On Pull Requests Comments
Tue Oct 22 14:25:32 CEST 2013
"What Steve Said"
Seriously, I too am a big +1 for the PRs.
Most of the (minor) complaining that I've heard tends to stem around "make it even better", which really isn't a reason to eliminate this...
That Tall Bald Indian Guy...
Google+ | Blog | Twitter | LinkedIn
On Oct 22, 2013, at 8:09 AM, Steve Vinoski <vinoski@REDACTED> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Björn-Egil Dahlberg <egil@REDACTED> wrote:
> Are PR's as bad as Anthony points out? Should we kill it and use mails only?
> No, please please don't do that. I'm a big +1 for PRs -- IMO they work much better than previous approaches, and I've heard similar positive opinions from a number of coworkers and from folks at recent Erlang meetups in the US and Europe.
> erlang-questions mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions