[erlang-questions] Intrusive function intercept
Thu Oct 10 10:54:05 CEST 2013
Yes, we can change the code of the *test* function and use messages;
however I was wondering whether there is another approach. Our idea is to
build a resource access control system which authorizes access to
resources. We came up with the following implementation options:
1) change the Erlang/OTP libraries - ruled out (not an option)
2) perform checks before each access - will have to change our current
code and add these checks
3) using monitoring as described in the previous post - monitoring process
performs checks and only allow processes to proceed if they've got the
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Tyron Zerafa <tyron.zerafa@REDACTED>wrote:
> I would like to monitor a process and suspend the execution of certain
> functions to perform some other computation before. For instance consider a
> process A which executing the following simple function.
> test() ->
> I would like to initiate a process, B, that monitors the execution of A.
> I want B to:
> 1) stop A before function y is executed
> 2) execute some logic
> 3) resumes the execution of A (by executing Y and Z)
> So far, I have been following this post<http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2003-January/006679.html>and managed to determine when the y() function call was being done, but
> cannot suspend its execution. Any ideas how I can achieve this?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions