[erlang-questions] Fwd: erldocs.com updated!

[Ola Bäckström]

Excellent news,

Thanks Pierre for your work to keep erldocs updated, it is one of my top-10 links!

A question, is there a reason for the documentation of newer Erlang/OTP versions not to provide type information?
For instance R14B02 do provide that, in yellow boxes. Compare
  http://erldocs.com/R14B02/stdlib/gb_trees.html?i=0&search=gb_trees:balance#balance/1
with
  http://erldocs.com/R16B02/stdlib/gb_trees.html?i=0&search=gb_trees:balance#balance/1

The first link shows that the function argument should be of type gb_tree() but the latter not.

/Ola

From: erlang-questions-bounces@REDACTED [mailto:erlang-questions-bounces@REDACTED] On Behalf Of Pierre Fenoll
Sent: den 2 oktober 2013 16:03
To: erlang-questions@REDACTED Questions
Subject: [erlang-questions] Fwd: erldocs.com updated!

Hi,

http://erldocs.com is a fast and accessible alternative to the official Erlang/OTP documentation.
Originally developed by Dale Harvey, it was no longer supported since the release of R15B.

I recently took over erldocs.com<http://erldocs.com> and the erldocs GitHub project, fixed some issues and compiled documentation for all Erlang/OTP versions. The website is now hosted on GitHub gh-pages as it is only static files (thank you GitHub, that's amazing!) and back on tracks!

Go check another Erlang doc at http://erldocs.com/
Go check the code                at https://github.com/fenollp/erldocs


Cheers,
--
Pierre Fenoll


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20131002/c51fe0de/attachment.htm>