Fri May 10 19:14:22 CEST 2013
Just like in the case of lists/strings and binaries, the reason the conversions happen is because the data types converted to and from are useful in different ways!
I agree we should avoid cluttering the language up, but if we view/use Maps as replacement for Dicts and Frames as replacement for Records, then the situation wouldn't be any more cluttered than it already is.
El May 10, 2013, a las 12:30 PM, Max Lapshin <max.lapshin@REDACTED> escribió:
> erlang is a rather simple language, which is seriously spoiled by
> endless list_to_binary and binary_to_list conversions. Are you really
> sure that we need map_to_frame and frame_to_map ?
> erlang-questions mailing list
More information about the erlang-questions