[erlang-questions] scp subsystem

[Stefan Jahn]

Hello,

it sounds like you have some experiences on that area.

You were successfully implementing it using the ssh_cli option
of ssh:daemon(), yes?

I'll give it a try if anything happening in the module
code when hooking it into ssh_cli.

I can leave out shell option, as well as subsystems?

Can I add e.g. {subsystems, [ssh_sftp:subsystem_spec([])]}} having
the sftp server in parallel?

Thank you,
  Stefan.

On Tue, March 19, 2013 3:49 pm, Attila Rajmund Nohl wrote:
> 2013/3/19 Stefan Jahn <stefan@REDACTED>:
>> Hello,
>>
>> this means,  one should use
>>
>> ssh:daemon(..., ..., [
>>   {shell, {Module, Function, Args}},
>>   ...])
>>
>> instead of
>> ssh:daemon(..., ..., [
>>   {subsystems, [subsystem_spec()]},
>>   ...])
>>
>> correct?
>
> No, unfortunately this is the one that won't work due to the group
> swallowing the \000 characters. You should use
>
> ssh:daemon(..., ..., [
> 	{ssh_cli,{..., ...}},
>         ...])
>
> and your callback module has to implement the ssh_channel behaviour.
>
> [...]
>> So, it will be impossible to implement it using the shell API?
>
> I think yes, we've never managed to get it work using the shell API.
>