[erlang-questions] bit syntax: 0-sized segments

[Ulf Wiger]

On 8 Mar 2013, at 09:51, Max Lapshin wrote:

> It is my fault. Pad can never be 0 sized in this code. 
> 
> Perhaps it is bug in Ulf's code?

Not a bug in the code, but a bug in my recollection (and copy-pasting without thinking).  :)

It is quite likely that some of the design choices in sext are  suboptimal, but anyone is welcome to try their hand at improving the compactness of the encodings. There's a pretty good QuickCheck suite there to ensure that the properties are not violated in the process.

BR,
Ulf

Ulf Wiger, Co-founder & Developer Advocate, Feuerlabs Inc.
http://feuerlabs.com



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20130308/441a7cf0/attachment.htm>