[erlang-questions] rebar dev

[Stanislav Sedov]

On Jun 25, 2013, at 1:22 AM, Tim Watson <watson.timothy@REDACTED> wrote:

> On 25 Jun 2013, at 00:29, Tiago Cury <tcury@REDACTED> wrote:
> 
>> Erlang adoption could be bigger if it had a standard tool chain for building and package mgmt (retrieve and dependency). Look at the universe of java: ant, maven, buidr, gant, ivy, sbt, etc… etc… etc….
> 
> And how exactly is that (list) a standard tool chain?
> 

I believe that was <sarcasm></sarcasm>.

--
ST4096-RIPE