[erlang-questions] rebar dev

[Tristan Sloughter]

Yup, rebar has commands like 'shell' and 'ct' and used to have 'dialyzer'.
All have never worked as you'd expect, causing everyone to still use
Makefiles. Without those 3 commands at least, plus consistent compiling of
c_src would be nice..., rebar is just a slightly better erlc and still
requires Make.


On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Tiago Cury <tcury@REDACTED> wrote:

> I tried rebar shell, Look:
>
> Air11:Backuper tcury$ ./rebar shell
> ==> jsx (shell)
> NOTICE: Using experimental 'shell' command
> ==> ibrowse (shell)
> NOTICE: Using experimental 'shell' command
> ==> yaws (shell)
> NOTICE: Using experimental 'shell' command
> ==> meck (shell)
> NOTICE: Using experimental 'shell' command
> ==> erlcloud (shell)
> NOTICE: Using experimental 'shell' command
> ==> Backuper (shell)
> NOTICE: Using experimental 'shell' command
> Erlang R16B (erts-5.10.1) [source-05f1189] [64-bit] [smp:2:2]
> [async-threads:10] [hipe] [kernel-poll:false]
>
>
> =ERROR REPORT==== 24-Jun-2013::20:00:31 ===
>
>  driver_select(0x0000000011c82648, 0, ERL_DRV_READ ERL_DRV_USE, 1) by
> tty_sl (tty_sl -c -e) driver #Port<0.5953> stealing control of fd=0 from
> input driver fd (0/1) #Port<0.505>
>
>
>       Eshell V5.10.1  (abort with ^G)
>
>                                      1> Eshell V5.10.1  (abort with ^G)
> 1> q().
> ok
> 2>
> {error_logger,{{2013,6,24},{20,0,56}},"~s~n",["driver_select(0x0000000011c809d0,
> 0, ERL_DRV_READ ERL_DRV_WRITE, 0) by fd (0/1) driver #Port<0.505> stealing
> control of fd=0 from input driver tty_sl (tty_sl -c -e) #Port<0.5953> \n"]}
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20130624/9d7c5711/attachment.htm>