[erlang-questions] style question - best way to test multiple non-guard conditions sequentially
Richard A. O'Keefe
ok@REDACTED
Mon Jun 24 00:17:05 CEST 2013
On 21/06/2013, at 8:21 PM, Anthony Ramine wrote:
> qual -> pat '<-' expr.
> qual -> bin_pat '<=' expr.
> qual -> expr.
>
> And then I would also add two generators which do not skip elements but crash instead:
>
> qual -> pat '<:-' expr.
> qual -> bin_pat '<:=' expr.
I don't understand what these are supposed to do.
Would you care to say more?
>
> I do like the different direction you took though. Allowing only guards mean matches can be handled differently, thus one could write X = foo() instead of begin X = foo(), true end.
I've been using X <- [foo()].
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list