[erlang-questions] Adding new operators?
David Goehrig
dave@REDACTED
Sat Apr 13 21:44:10 CEST 2013
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Anthony Ramine <n.oxyde@REDACTED> wrote:
>
> For example he could write a parse transform for a parallel send operator
> like this:
>
> +[Pids/parallel] ! Message.
>
> This is beyond ugly but at least it's quite obvious that some spooky
> action at the distance is going on.
>
This isn't as ugly as one might think.. Say
erl_scan:string(" Pids @! Message ").
yields
{ok,[{var,1,'Pids'},{'@',1},{'!',1},{var,1,'Message'}],1}
and
erl_scan:string(" Pids #! Message ").
yields
{ok,[{var,1,'Pids'},{'#',1},{'!',1},{var,1,'Message'}],1}
these I can transform into something reasonable ... and @! as parallel
array send and #! and parallel hash send have a sort of Perlish beauty to
them :)
AFAICT neither @! nor #! mean anything in existing erlang code as both are
syntax errors (which in this case is a good thing).
Dave
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- http://blog.dloh.org/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20130413/d01fa68e/attachment.htm>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list