[erlang-questions] can a program launched with open_port({spawn, Cmd}, Options) remain running after the port closes?

Tim Watson watson.timothy@REDACTED
Fri Sep 28 13:45:14 CEST 2012

The project doesn't appear to build cleanly on mac os lion:

t4@REDACTED:erlexec $ ./configure 
configure: error: cannot find install-sh, install.sh, or shtool in config "."/config
t4@REDACTED:erlexec $ ./build 
Install dir: /usr/local/src/erlang/erlexec/install
autoconf -i
configure.ac:19: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PROG_LIBTOOL
     If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
     See the Autoconf documentation.
make: *** [configure] Error 1
t4@REDACTED:erlexec $ 
t4@REDACTED:erlexec $ autoconf -V
autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69
Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+/Autoconf: GNU GPL version 3 or later
<http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>, <http://gnu.org/licenses/exceptions.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.

Written by David J. MacKenzie and Akim Demaille.
t4@REDACTED:erlexec $ 

Is there a specific version of autotools required to build and compile erlexec?

On 27 Sep 2012, at 20:11, Tim Watson wrote:

> On 27 Sep 2012, at 19:18, freza@REDACTED wrote:
>> Haven't been following this thread closely, but it seems erlexec wasn't
>> mentioned yet:
>> 	http://code.google.com/p/erlexec/
> Doesn't appear very well maintained. I might pick it apart and rewrite it when native processes get released - it is a cool idea. Anyway, for the time being it's not a great help as I'm writing a framework to help set up and tear down clusters for distributed testing (based largely on common test) so I want to minimise the number of dependencies as much as possible. Besides, I'm more interested in working on the remote/ssh runner+monitor next, rather than spending another age fiddling around with the script runner. 
> But yes, erlexec does look interesting and has been on my radar since it popped up on this list a few months back, discussing the desire to do proper signal handling (such as sending SIGTERM, SIGHUP, etc to the external program) without resorting to os:cmd("kill -" ++ Code ++ " " ++ OsPid). Again, this is something that linked-in drivers *can* deal with to a limited extent, and therefore I suspect that native processes will make for a very nice foundation on which to build an alternative to open_port/2.    
> Also, IIRC there was a cool command line testing framework open sourced in the last year which was announced on this list. I can't remember what it was called, but it has a port driver that handles the the external comms and so on - looked very nice, although that's not what I'm trying to do/be as my focus is on getting things in a consistent state and monitoring to make sure they stay that way through the test run, then tearing down nicely before the next phase kicks off.
> Cheers,
> Tim

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 235 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20120928/f2d19556/attachment.bin>

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list