[erlang-questions] How to introspect atom table?

Zabrane Mickael zabrane3@REDACTED
Tue Nov 20 13:05:23 CET 2012


Did you try increase this limit:
$ erl ... +t 4194304

Regards,
Zabrane

On Nov 20, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Max Lapshin wrote:

> Atoms: 1048576
> =memory
> total: 507885448
> processes: 336611825
> processes_used: 336601278
> system: 171273623
> atom: 52749265
> atom_used: 52707589
> binary: 6311816
> code: 3898230
> ets: 2209656
> =hash_table:atom_tab
> size: 411527
> used: 322545
> objs: 1048577
> depth: 21
> 
> 
> This looks like a problem, yes?
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Gleb Peregud <gleber.p@REDACTED> wrote:
> AFAIK crash dump contains atom list.
> 
> Also erlang:memory(atom) or erlang:memory(atom_used) can be useful
> 
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Max Lapshin <max.lapshin@REDACTED> wrote:
> > Erlang system is crashing with atom limit.
> > Is it possible to look inside atom table, maybe I'll see something like:
> > 'user_15', 'user_157' and will quickly find source of problems.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > erlang-questions mailing list
> > erlang-questions@REDACTED
> > http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20121120/19995ac1/attachment.htm>


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list