[erlang-questions] Rebar dependency recursion

[Tim Watson]

On 5 Nov 2012, at 23:24, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Tim Watson wrote:
>> Dude...
>> 
>> On 4 Nov 2012, at 23:56, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Tim Watson wrote:
>>>> [snip]
>>> This could work. I'll let you all know once the prototype is ready
>>> for testing.
>> 
>> You rock! :)
>> 
>> Once you give the say so, I'll test all my plugins + projects
>> against your branch.
> 
> Here's a quick prototype you can test:
> https://github.com/tuncer/rebar/compare/recursion
> It's not ready for merging and some of the internals are subject to
> change.
> 
> We also have to discuss config inheritance and whether it should
> be made explicit or removed.

Great, I'll have a look at that after work today. I'm not married to the config inheritance either way, though the ability to override the config in sub_dirs using plugins is important to me.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 235 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20121106/ad3a4355/attachment.bin>