[erlang-questions] Getting rid of the preprocessor

Michael Turner michael.eugene.turner@REDACTED
Fri May 25 17:18:06 CEST 2012

> ... the oh-so-old-that-Google-can't-find-an-electronic-copy-if-one-even-exists
> paper "Delenda est preprocessor" even before that (1998?).

Is it this?

   Richard O'Keefe. Abstract patterns for Erlang. Fourth International
Erlang/OTP User Conference.

In context, the citations I've seen seem to indicate this paper.
Perhaps someone would be so kind as to scan it and put it online?

-michael turner

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Vlad Dumitrescu <vladdu55@REDACTED> wrote:
> Hi Richard,
> My real question got buried in the discussion about my particular use
> case: previously when the preprocessor and its demise were discussed,
> one main reason for not being able to do anything about it at the
> moment was that first we need to do something about the records. But
> the preprocessor doesn't do anything to records, they are processed by
> the compiler. To quote you from a recent thread: "Abstract patterns
> and frames are all part of a long-time project to make the
> preprocessor unnecessary". Could you please enlighten me as to how the
> preprocessor is involved here?
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Richard O'Keefe <ok@REDACTED> wrote:
>> On 25/05/2012, at 12:02 AM, Vlad Dumitrescu wrote:
>>> As one example, how would you parse the following line?
>>>    ?HELLO(world)
>> I am no friend of the preprocessor.
>> But this at least is no new problem:  C has exactly the same
>> problem, and presumably the C and C++ support in Eclipse
>> already does something with it.
> Yes, it's not new and yes, the C/C++ support does something with it.
> The problem at hand is that we don't have the kind of resources that
> were put into the C support by the likes of Intel, IBM, Texas
> Instruments and, yes, even Ericsson. There are many tens of man-years
> invested in that project...
>> I presume it goes something like this:
>>        if it looks like a variable, display it as one;
>>        if it looks like a function call, display it as one;
>>        if the display is wrong, it's the programmer's fault
>>        for defining such a stupid macro.
> The displaying of fancy colors in the editor is not the important
> issue. An IDE needs to know as much detail as possible about the code,
> to support navigation and refactorings, to be able to suggest
> meaningful completions and offer reasonable ways to fix any issues it
> finds. This isn't possible if one can't understand (=parse) the code
> properly.
>>        if the display is wrong, it's the programmer's fault
>>        for defining such a stupid macro.
> Unfortunately, this argument doesn't really work for legacy systems,
> where the development environment has to work with code that won't be
> changed unless it's broken at runtime.
> For macros that expand to well-formed expressions, we can treat them
> as function calls, that's the easy part. There are other uses where
> the parser needs to be prepared for all kinds of weirdness. The most
> pervasive example is the '?line' macro used with common_test (this is
> now no longer necessary, but see above about legacy), but I have to
> handle for example macros that expand to:
> - whole function clauses, in the middle of regular clauses
> - guard tests including the 'when' keyword
> The parser grammar is basically describing this nice language, except
> that any grammar construct or combination thereof may be represented
> by a macro call...
> In any case, the problems related to smart editors are not the only
> ones, there were many people complaining for not so many years ago and
> you wrote the oh-so-old-that-Google-can't-find-an-electronic-copy-if-one-even-exists
> paper "Delenda est preprocessor" even before that (1998?).
> I'm taking the liberty of quoting you here:
> "... the preprocessor is violently
> at odds with everything else in the language.  One of the papers I
> wrote for SERC had the title "Delenda Est Preprocessor".  There
> really isn't anything that can be done with the processor that
> could not be done better without it.  In particular, one of the
> major things about Erlang is the module system combined with hot
> loading, but the preprocessor subverts the module system and
> causes dependencies between source units that are not and cannot
> be tracked by the run time system."
> [http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2006-March/019614.html]
> best regards,
> Vlad
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list