[erlang-questions] binary_to_integer/1 and binary_to_float/1 and friends

Richard Carlsson carlsson.richard@REDACTED
Mon May 7 21:06:58 CEST 2012

EEPs should only be needed for changes to the language itself, or more 
far reaching changes to the standard libraries. For a small change like 
this, just submit it as a patch and see if OTP will take it in. Don't 
forget that documentation and test cases are needed as well.


On 2012-05-07 16:01, José Valim wrote:
> Can someone from the OTP team let me know if I need an EEP for this or
> if I should just send patches straight to erlang-patches? Thanks in advance.
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 7:47 PM, José Valim <jose.valim@REDACTED
> <mailto:jose.valim@REDACTED>> wrote:
>     At the beginning of this year, there was a discussion about how to
>     implement binary_to_integer/1 in Erlang.
>     There is a possible implementation for such function which is quite
>     trivial:
>          list_to_integer(binary_to_list(binary))
>     However, it has the trade-off that it can't be used in guards
>     (unless defined in a macro) and there is an unnecessary conversion
>     cost to list (although the cost is small since both binary and list
>     are likely small).
>     With Riak, Cowboy and other tools pushing towards using binaries
>     instead of lists for strings, the need for such functions will
>     become more and more common.
>     Is there any chance we will see this as built-in functions and
>     therefore available in guards in R16?
>     Thanks,
>     *
>     *José Valim*
>     www.plataformatec.com.br <http://www.plataformatec.com.br/>
>     Founder and Lead Developer
>     *
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list