[erlang-questions] Building, Packaging and Installing

Joe Armstrong erlang@REDACTED
Mon May 7 09:37:48 CEST 2012


I've been watching this thread - but not contributing ...

I have a few questions/thoughts/comments

1) NodeJSs NPM looks pretty good to me. I've been toying with the idea
of making a clone
    the advantages of cloning seem to be:
    - it is very well documented
    - it has a decent set of commands
    - it produces a reasonable (target) directory structure

2) What's wrong today?

     It seems to me that the single biggest problem is the lack of a decent
     manifest file.

     NodeJS uses
     For comparison Google chrome apps use
     We (Erlang) use

      In a sense once you *defined* the manifest file and the file
system layout, all the rest
      follows naturally. (Once you've agreed on the data formats -
which program produces
      the files is irrelevant)

      Now the .app files date from a time *before* Erlang was open
source, so there
      are no things for licenses, digital signatures and so on.

      So I think a first step is hammer out the content of the manifest.

       The manifest could be simple or very complicated - so there are
a lot of design questions

3) Tricky problems

        How do we avoid version nightmares?

        i.e. if A depends upon X.vsn1 and breaks with X.vsn2
             and B depends upon X.vsn2 and breaks with X.vsn1
        how can we run A and B in the same namespace?

      Three answers:

         a) You can't
         b) Declare A to be broken and fix it (assuming X.vsn2 is the
latest and best version of
         c) do some magic name munging (refactoring)
              that allows A and B to run in the same namspace with
X.vsn1 and X.vsn2
         d) run in separate nodes with message passing
         e) add some sort of namespaces to erlang


               c) is pie in the sky - I don't see this happening realistically

               d) yes - but the apps need changing

               e) is research

               a) is bad

               b) is the best option - fix A - now why can't the
refactoring guys do this for us :-)

            In practice I'd mail the authors of A and hope they could help

4) Signing

      No we want digital signatures - bla bla bla .... signed code

5) Should packages be unpacked on the target machines

     (I think not - this is abstraction breaking)

     The way rebar is packaged is nice.

6) The way forward

     - Define a new manifest (say erlang .app files with inspiration from NPM)
     - Define the layout of the local repository (ie where things land
locally after
        a package has been fetched)
    - Make a clone of NPM (or similar)
    - Make a converter that sucks code from rebar github repository
       and repackages, throwing away the history inn (.git)

7) Binary or source packages?

    - Ummm - tricky

8) Community buy-in

    We need one recognised format that everybody uses.

I'd actually proposed a NPM clone as the subject of a hackathon at the
next Erlang
User conference (in may) - now (of course) this is not a particularly difficult
program to write (famous last words) - the tricky bit is agreeing on the
manifest and file layout and semantics of updates etc.

If any of you guys are coming to the Erlang users conference in
Stockholm I'd be happy to
discuss this - or even participate in a hackathon session



On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Ciprian Dorin Craciun
<ciprian.craciun@REDACTED> wrote:
>    (As no-one replied in 4 days, I'll add my opinion...)
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Tristan Sloughter
> <tristan.sloughter@REDACTED> wrote:
>> I started with this problem as something to simply discuss with the
>> maintainers of certain build and package management projects -- sinan and
>> agner specifically. But it seems to be more broad and cover how all of us
>> who keep apps on github handle versioning and dependencies.
>> The basic issue is app versions within .app files on branches in github, the
>> resultant directory from a agner install and the discrepancies this causes.
>> [...]
>> Am I the only one going crazy with this?
>    Nop. I've been faced with this problem myself a couple of times.
> (I've chosen to ignore it.)
>> Does anyone have
>> suggestions/examples of what they do for production projects on teams to
>> ease these annoyances?
>    For example for my project I have one big Git repository called
> `myproject-repositories` (replace `myproject` with what you need) with
> submodules pointing to the dependencies.
>    Then inside my own project repositories I have a symlink
> `.repositories` poiting to the "current" snapshot of dependencies.
>    I also don't use any of rebar, agner, etc., mainly because I've
> hacked something on-top of the ninja build system.
>> I mostly just create my own packages and repos of dependencies, or package
>> third party deps with the project.
>    Yup. +1 :)
>    P.S.: I hate Java from the bottom of my heart, but boy-o-boy is
> the Java tooling way better than that of Erlang... I mean what Erlang
> is missing is something similar to NodeJS's NPM, or Java's Maven
> (minus the XML baggage and all useless complexities), or Python
> setup-tools (with virtual environment), etc...
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list