[erlang-questions] Frames proposal
Tue May 1 19:29:10 CEST 2012
On 1 May 2012, at 19:19, Björn-Egil Dahlberg wrote:
> It is entirely possible we are fooling ourselves with a similar syntax and would be better off with a completely different syntax.
I'm in the camp of
- similar syntax indicates similar semantics
- different syntax indicates different semantics
…or something to that effect. Most importantly, I definitely agree that borrowing a syntax just because it's well-established, is a very bad idea if your intention is to give it different semantics from what one would expect.
Ulf Wiger, Co-founder & Developer Advocate, Feuerlabs Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions